Vojo Harvester™
An independent sensor watches the screen itself. That is Proof of Display: proof from the glass that a playback log can never invent.
It ships with Passport and goes on the panels that need hard proof, adding to the same play and its vTrust Score. No special setup.

Why a log is not enough
A scheduling log proves content was sent. It cannot prove the screen was on, lit, and showing the right creative. Harvester can.
The screen was off
MERIDIAN
M40
ALL‑ELECTRIC · 412 MILES
Book a test drive.
FROM £38,950
The frame was frozen
SUNLARK
Summer
sale.
IN STORE NOW
The wrong creative ran
In every one of these the log does not go quiet. It reports a successful play. That is the difference between evidence that is incomplete and evidence that is wrong, and it is only visible to something watching the screen rather than the software.
How it works
Think of a security camera for the ad. Not for the people walking by: for the panel itself. The same three beats run on every play it covers.
A separate sensor on the screen watches the panel itself. Separate from the player, separate from the software log.
What the sensor sees is matched to the content fingerprint for the scheduled campaign. Right creative, right panel.
A matched read becomes a Proof of Display record, timestamped and tied to campaign and screen. It joins the same play Passport already carries.
The sensor samples the panel itself.
Awaiting match
campaign · screen · timestamp
The sensor is separate from the player and from the playback log, so the record does not depend on the thing being checked. Colours shown are illustrative.
Truly independent
Independence has two halves: who is doing the reporting, and where they are standing. An operator log fails both. Passport is a real third-party report, but it reports from inside the render.
Only a sensor stands outside the playback path entirely. Whatever put the picture there, our stack or somebody else's, it either appeared on the glass or it did not. That is why Proof of Display is the ceiling.
Patented · UK & US
Vojo's Proof of Display method is granted in the UK and US, with a European application pending. The practical point for buyers: this is not a software ping dressed up as glass proof.
Always with Passport
Harvester always ships with Passport. Passport runs on every screen; fit Harvesters where Proof of Display counts, and it joins the same play automatically.
Passport · inside the ad · every screen
Content-level check-in that travels with the creative. Nothing to install on the operator side.
More on PassportHarvester · on the glass · where fitted
That is Proof of Display. It sits on top of Passport on the screens with a Harvester. No special wrap, no second creative path.
Proof of Play vs Proof of DisplayThe honest ceiling. Harvester does not replace Passport's proof; it adds to it on the same play. vTrust Score rolls both layers into one comparable number and scores only the layers really there, so a screen without a Harvester gets no invented glass credit.
Where it fits
A sensor per screen is a real cost. It earns that back where verified delivery changes what the slot is worth, or what an argument costs you.
Rate-card upside
Roadside, retail flagship, stadium bowl. Slots priced high enough that a buyer will ask what actually ran, and where verified delivery lifts the rate.
Fewer disputes
Agency or brand buyers reconcile your numbers against their own. When the count is provable you can stop padding campaigns with free impressions to cover the margin of error.
Ground truth
Mixed hardware, uneven maintenance, no reliable picture of which panels are really lit. The sensor tells you what the logs will not.
No site visits
Place-based screens in remote, secured or spread-out locations, where sending someone to check a panel costs more than the slot earns. The sensor checks it every play, so nobody has to travel to find out.
Proof of notice
Hospitals, transport hubs, venues and workplaces where a notice has to be on the screen and someone may later ask whether it was. The sensor shows it was visible, not just scheduled.
See what the glass recorded on a live panel, next to what the log claimed.
How it compares
Logs, reports and tags all have a place. Two questions separate them: who is reporting, and where they stand.
| Evidence | Who reports | Where it stands | Good for | What it misses |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player / CMS playback logs | The seller's own software | Inside the playback path | Operations and basic delivery tracking inside one network. | Cannot prove the panel was on, lit, or showing the right creative. It reports success either way. |
| Operator report alone | The seller | Their own systems | Fast when relationships are close and stakes are low. | Advertisers increasingly want third-party glass evidence. |
| Creative tags, no glass sensor | A third party (this is where Passport sits) | Inside the player's render | Content-level check-in across networks, with no hardware. | Inherits whatever the render does. Not an independent eye on the glass. |
| Harvester, on top of Passport | A third party | Outside the playback path, watching the glass | Proof of Display from the glass on the screens where it is fitted. | A sensor per screen is a real cost. Fit it where proof is worth it. |
Questions
Proof of Display
The glass doesn't lie. Prove it that way.
Fit Harvester where buyers need hard glass proof. It adds proof from the glass to the same Passport play, and the vTrust Score counts it, with no change to the creative.
20 minutes. Live panel or sample report. Plain answers.